Hola Sitepoint! That’s right. In much the same way as that ulcer you get every time after gorging in those yummy chili tacos, I am publishy again. This time courtesy of Sitepoint (utmost thanks go out to Georgina and the rest of the editorial staff for a great job).
This piece, Tables vs. CSS - A match to the death is a case study on Table versus CSS based coding, trying to reproduce the same basic design to a “t”. This time around I dropped the “we” authorial slant for a less formal, more personal first person approach (I did this because Sitepoint’s submission rules state so, but ended up liking the freedom and personal-osity).
I hope this article serves as an interesting exploration of a highly subjective problem. I actually wrote it a month ago, but in view of recent commentary and the shitstorm that ensued, I think the timing for its publication couldn’t be better.
Update: This article has just won the “Article of the Month” award at Sitepoint. Thanks a lot people!
— sergio on May 27, 2004 
Fixed. Thanks!
Muy bueno el articulo… great article… It is defenitly easier to modify a site made out of css than tables.
Thay’s an incredible article, Sergio.
I’d like to see a third match with an hybrid (CSS styled tables) solution.
CSS styled tables are an abomination to CSS standard to make table designed sites, CSS enabled.
Great article sergio.
So in conclusion, I should use tables?
I guess Salamastre should use tables for IE5.0 design. IE 5.0 has a bigger audience that Mozilla, by Google Zietgeist reports.
Figure in some more time to fix the layout for IE 5.0.
*cough*check the sitepoint link*cough*